JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 12, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alexei Egor Julio Estrada

✓Claimant Elsa Mendoza De Ceballos·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Presupuestos materiales de procedencia
  • Negar por cuanto se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
  • Requisitos formales de procedencia
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Nulidad.

La memorialista presenta solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-142/12y apoya su petición en distintas razones, tales como un presunto incumplimiento por parte del Ministerio de Transporte en la ejecución de las órdenes impartidas en la sentencia de segunda instancia del proceso reivindicatorio ordinario, la inmediatez en la interposición de tutela y la existencia de un perjuicio irremediable.

La Corte encuentra improcedente utilizar la instancia de la nulidad para crear una etapa procesal adicional en la que se discuta nuevamente el problema jurídico planteado y resuelto por la Sala de Revisión- Se decide DENEGAR la petición de nulidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T- 142 de 2012 proferida por la Sala Octava de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.